[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":97},["ShallowReactive",2],{"pages:\u002Fclient-stories\u002Fwashington-state-efficiency-commission":3},{"id":4,"title":5,"body":6,"canonicalPath":81,"createdAt":82,"cta":82,"description":83,"extension":84,"meta":85,"navigation":86,"path":81,"schemaOrg":87,"seo":90,"slug":77,"status":93,"stem":94,"type":95,"updatedAt":82,"__hash__":96},"pages\u002Fclient-stories\u002Fwashington-state-efficiency-commission.md","Washington State Efficiency Commission",{"type":7,"value":8,"toc":76},"minimark",[9,13,18,25,33,36,39,42,47,50,53,56,59,63,66,69,73],[10,11,5],"h1",{"id":12},"washington-state-efficiency-commission",[14,15,17],"h2",{"id":16},"consolidate-government-operations-across-multiple-agencies","Consolidate Government Operations Across Multiple Agencies",[19,20,21],"p",{},[22,23,24],"strong",{},"Two Agencies. One Fishing License. A Win for Everyone.",[19,26,27],{},[28,29,30],"em",{},[22,31,32],{},"Washington State had two agencies issuing separate fishing licenses. Consolidation made sense—but agreement required reconciling competing agency interests.",[19,34,35],{},"Two agencies. One angler. Two fishing licenses.",[19,37,38],{},"Washington’s Department of Fisheries issued licenses for salmon and trout, while the Department of Wildlife handled steelhead. Fishermen faced extra paperwork and inconvenience; government maintained duplicate systems at unnecessary cost.",[19,40,41],{},"Consolidation seemed obvious. But which agency would take responsibility—and would the other agree?",[43,44,46],"h4",{"id":45},"managementpro-role","ManagementPro Role",[19,48,49],{},"The Governor’s Efficiency Commission selected us to guide a task force and develop a solution. The 12 members included private-sector executives on loan and senior government officials from both departments.",[19,51,52],{},"The licensing and IT representatives from both agencies served on the task force. Instead of defending separate positions, they joined facilitated discussions to examine alternatives, weigh the merits, and reach a collaborative decision.",[19,54,55],{},"We also consulted external stakeholders, including Indian tribes, charter boat operators, conservation groups, and legislative offices. Their views helped shape a recommendation responsive to interests beyond the agencies.",[19,57,58],{},"What might have become a turf battle became a cooperative search for the best solution.",[43,60,62],{"id":61},"results","Results",[19,64,65],{},"The outcome was a genuine win-win. Government gained one licensing system that was easier and cheaper to administer. Fishermen faced less paperwork and hassle. Both agencies helped shape the decision rather than having it imposed on them.",[19,67,68],{},"The Legislature approved the recommendation unanimously, and the consolidation was implemented.",[43,70,72],{"id":71},"lessons-learned","Lessons Learned",[19,74,75],{},"When people with competing interests help make a decision on the merits, difficult changes can become shared wins.",{"title":77,"searchDepth":78,"depth":78,"links":79},"",2,[80],{"id":16,"depth":78,"text":17},"\u002Fclient-stories\u002Fwashington-state-efficiency-commission",null,"Examples of complex initiatives designed for successful execution.","md",{},true,{"primaryType":88,"jsonLdMode":89},"WebPage","generated",{"metaTitle":91,"metaDescription":83,"indexable":86,"robots":92,"title":5,"description":83},"Washington State Efficiency Commission | ManagementPro","index,follow","published","client-stories\u002Fwashington-state-efficiency-commission","page","ds-_SPguS36GHDXPSQ6k_vySMDd4AKNsZ3Gl0hp3e20",1793666307906]